Definition of Key Terms
Definition of Key Terms
Every day we hear people use ill-defined words and phrases which results in too much ambiguity and vagueness in their use of language, which leads to misunderstandings, confusion, error, omissions and more conflict.
In order to avoid these negative consequences, we should learn how to define the exact meaning of our major terms and concepts.
The issue of giving clear definitions to abstract ideas is one of immense importance, because the success of individuals and teams requires, we can make ourselves clearly understood in both the written and spoken word.
Giving clear definitions is the key to clarity in communication.
But giving clear definitions is not easy, especially when we are trying to explain (or to understand) highly technical or philosophical, or ethical, or emotional, morale, political or economic terms.
For instance, abstract concepts such as Quality, Fair, Professional, Compassionate etc are inherently ambiguous and open to multiple interpretations, which gets in the way of “delivery” because each person interprets them in their own unique way and so, in practice there can be a lack of consistency.
What is the solution to this problem?
The solution is to write clear definitions of all your major Key-terms and Values, by learning the “C.G.4D system”.
What is C.G.4D definition?
C.G.4D. definition is a system you use to define every abstract concept and “value”.
It is a three-part model:
- Context
- Genus
- 4 Differencia
C = Context: Each word operates within a given context, (e.g. Social care, Police, NHS, Business etc) and each definition must be specific to your particular work context.
So, whenever you are writing a definition, the first step is to NAME THE CONTEXT (i.e. Where we work) we define Concept X as (G. 4D).”
G = Genus - General class name: The next step is to put your concept into its broader class. Everything that exists can be thought of as being a member or example of a broader class.
For instance:
- “Dog” may be classified is an “ANIMAL”, or perhaps a PET, (depending on the context).
- “Burglary” is classified as a “CRIME”.
- “Integrity” is classified as a MORAL PRINCIPLE and / or SET OF POSITIVE BEHAVIOURS.
- “Quality” is classified as “An assessment of a product or a service, that describes the degree to which it possesses (or lacks) the following (4D)”.
4D = Three or Four ESSENTIAL, distinguishing characteristics by reference to which the term is applicable, and in the absence of which it is NOT applicable.
If you memorise the above sentence, you will have the major key to writing objective definitions.
Alternatively, you could memorise the following question, which is a restatement of the above.
“What are the three or four ESSENTIAL, distinguishing characteristics, that separate (the target concept) from other similar things in the same class?”
Now we specify the three of four essential, distinguishing characteristics that denote the exact meaning of the term; and thus, we make it clear what attributes it must have and how it is different from other similar things.
Here is where the real work begins because here, we become extremely specific, by naming the key ESSENTIAL attributes that must be present, and by virtue of which the term can be applied, and in absence of which it cannot be applied.
Term being defined
Where, when and to whom is the concept applied?
Context
Where, when and to whom is the concept applied?
Genus
What is the general class name, or broad description of the key term?
4 Differencia
What are the three or four ESSENTIAL, distinguishing characteristics by reference to which the term is applicable, and in the absence of which it is NOT applicable?
Distinguishing Characteristic 2
Distinguishing Characteristic 3
Distinguishing Characteristic 4
If the concept is of human construction or is the result of biological evolution, then it usually has a definite purpose, which we should write in box four.
Finished?
You may benefit from attending our personal development course.
Let's Get Social
If you think a friend might enjoy this, please share it with them:
Drag this button: Key Term Definitions Web-Widget to your bookmarks bar or desktop to save it for use later.
Clear Communication Articles From Our Blog
-
The Nlp Meta Model - Clear Thinking, Clear Communication
3 December 2024Learn how the NLP Meta Model enhances communication by addressing Deletions, Distortions, and Generalisations. Discover practical tips for asking better questions and improving clarity in conversations.
The NLP Meta Model: Clear Thinking, Clear Communication The NLP Meta Model is a tool used in Neuro-Linguistic Programming (NLP) to help us understand and clarify the way we think and talk. In daily conversations, people often make mistakes that can lead to confusion or misunderstandings. These mistakes fall into three main categories: Deletions, Distortions, and Generalisations. The Meta Model helps us identify these mistakes an... -
Effective Communication In the Workplace - Practical Examples for Success
15 October 2024Discover practical examples of effective communication techniques to foster understanding, reduce misunderstandings, and cultivate a positive working environment. Learn how clarity, feedback, and emotional management can transform workplace dynamics
Effective Communication in the Workplace: Practical Examples for Success Effective communication is the heartbeat of a productive workplace. Whether you're leading a team, managing a project, or simply collaborating with colleagues, communication is the key that turns intentions into actions. In this blog, we explore practical examples of effective communication techniques that can help you foster understanding, reduce misunderstandings, and cultivate a positive working envi... -
Finding a Common Frame of Reference
30 April 2024Instead of categorising people based on differences like gender, race, age, and personality traits. Finding a common frame of reference suggests focusing on similarities, rather than differences, to foster understanding and connection among people.
Finding a Common Frame of Reference We need to find a "Common Frame of Reference" which unites people. Categorising People We are taught to categorise people into different "types". Then we spend time trying to recognise and deal with each type. But rather than splitting people into different types: Man-woman; Black-white; Young-old; Introvert-extrovert; Visual-auditory-kinaesthetic; bosses-workers; etc.; why not instead focus o...