Corporate Coach Group Logo
Corporate
Coach Group
Teamwork · 2 min read

Tuckman's Five Stages of Team Development

Discover the Tuckman model's five team development stages and learn why leaders must move from description to action to raise team performance and morale.

Chris Farmer, Founder of Corporate Coach Group

“The Tuckman model maps every team’s life: Forming, Storming, Norming, Performing and Adjourning. It shows leaders what to expect, yet makes clear that only planned actions and clear words turn any group into a high-performance team.”

Chris Farmer — Founder, Corporate Coach Group

Tuckman's Five Stages of Team Development

Tuckman's Five Stages of Team Development

In 1965 Bruce Tuckman presented his description of the four stages of team development and called them 'Forming, Storming, Norming, and Performing'. In the 1970s he added a fifth stage which he called 'Adjourning'.

Forming

This stage denotes a group of people when they first come together to form a team.

They don't know each other, they don't know what the plan is, nor the standards which are expected of them. Team performance is at its lowest point.

Storming

This stage denotes the creation of social hierarchies, where the various personalities jostle with each other to determine their positions in the hierarchy of the group. This is a period of conflict as dominant personalities clash, and submissive personalities submit.

As the social hierarchy takes shape the work begins to flow and the productivity of the team improves.

Norming

This stage denotes the habitualisation of the social structures as people begin to settle down. Each person "knows their place" and what is expected of them. The productivity of the team improves still further.

Performing

This stage denotes the peak performance of the group, where everyone is in their "right place" and each person is perfecting their performance in their particular role, causing the productivity of the team as a whole to reach its zenith.

Adjourning

This stage denotes when the teams project is ended, and the team disbands, either temporarily or permanently. This marks the end of the team, and team performance ceases to exist.

Is the Tuckman's team model of value?

The model is of some value if leaders want to know what to expect.

It is not much value if leaders want to know exactly what to do and say in order to get the best performance from the team, at any stage of the process.

Descriptive verses Prescriptive theories.

Theories come in two main types, Descriptive and Prescriptive.

  • Descriptive theories describe what happens.
  • Prescriptive theories prescribe what actions we should take, in order to get the best results.

Most people need to know what to do and say, in order to get the best results, so most people need to learn prescriptive models.

Tuckman's model is descriptive, (not prescriptive), it does NOT give definite leadership responses to the five stages.

Consequently, we can categorise the Tuckman's Model as being "Interesting, but of a limited practical value".

Leaders need to learn exactly what to do and say

To get the best results, leaders need to learn exactly what to do and say. For this reason, there are better leadership models than Tuckman.

If you want to learn exactly what leaders should do and say, in order to get the best performance from the team, then please attend our Leadership and Management training course.

Tuckman model

In business team leadership, the Tuckman model is a group-development model that explains how any work team moves through five clear stages-Forming, Storming, Norming, Performing and Adjourning-in a set order, shows the social and task patterns at each stage, and covers teams from start to end so leaders can predict changes in performance.

CG4D Definition

Context: Business
Genus: Model

  • Outlines five named stages of team growth: forming, storming, norming, performing and adjourning
  • Treats the stages as sequential and universal to work teams
  • Provides descriptive social and task behaviours for each stage
  • Spans the team’s full life cycle from formation to disbandment

Article Summary

The Tuckman model maps every team’s life: Forming, Storming, Norming, Performing and Adjourning. It shows leaders what to expect, yet makes clear that only planned actions and clear words turn any group into a high-performance team.

Chris Farmer, Founder of Corporate Coach Group

Written by Chris Farmer

Founder & Lead Trainer, Corporate Coach Group

Chris Farmer is the founder of the Corporate Coach Group and has over 25 years experience designing and delivering leadership and management training across both the public and private sectors. His programmes are structured, practical and built around real-world performance. Read more about Chris and the story of how the Corporate Coach Group was founded.

Get new blogs by email

A new article each week — 5–10 minutes of practical thinking from our lead trainer.

Register Free

Key Statistics

Gallup’s 2023 State of the Global Workplace report shows only 23% of employees are engaged worldwide, yet teams whose managers provide clear direction and feedback achieve an 18% jump in productivity.

McKinsey & Company’s 2022 “Performance through People” study found cross-functional teams that undergo structured team-development training record a 30% higher project-success rate than teams that do not.

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about this topic

In this first of the team development stages, members meet, learn the basic goal and look for direction. Roles are unclear, standards unspoken and output is low while the group feels its way forward.
During the Storming stage personalities compete to set status, views and methods. Power struggles spark tension until clear rules and trust appear, raising focus and future team performance.
There is no set length for any team development stage. Some groups move in days, others take months. Speed hinges on clear goals, leadership response, resources and member experience.
Rarely. Without the shared norms forged in the Norming stage, a group lacks trust, agreed workflows and feedback loops, so it cannot sustain Performing quality or peak team performance.
The Tuckman model outlines what usually happens but gives no precise leadership response. Because it is descriptive, not prescriptive, managers must add other guidance to know exactly what to say or do.
In the Adjourning stage work ends, members separate and may feel loss, pride or relief. Productivity drops to zero, so leaders help closure by celebrating results and outlining next steps.
Yes. The Tuckman team leadership model is descriptive, not prescriptive. It maps Forming, Storming, Norming, Performing and Adjourning patterns but does not state exact actions to improve team performance.

Thought of something that has not been answered? Ask us today.

Leadership and Management Training

Build resilience and a productive mindset

Our Leadership and Management Training covers exactly these themes; handling pressure, building a productive mindset, and leading with clarity.