Investigative Vs Ordinary Conversations

Important: GDPR Email Preferences

As you may already know, the EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) will be coming into effect on 25th May 2018. We take your privacy seriously and we are working hard to ensure we comply with the new data protection laws. You can find out more about how we're doing this in our privacy policy on our website.

We want to make sure you continue to receive the latest newsletters, blogs, special offers and more.

As someone who has opted-in to receive our emails in the past, we’d like to give you this opportunity to confirm what you wish to receive:

Just so you know, if you don’t let us know what kinds of emails you want to receive from us, we’ll stop emailing you on the 24th May 2018 - you'll be missing out!

You are of course free to change your mind at any time – just follow the link at the bottom of any of our emails.

What are the Differences between Investigative vs Ordinary Conversations?

The key to successful investigations is knowing the differences between ordinary and investigative conversations. Here are three:

1. Goal focused vs Drifter conversations

Investigative conversations don't drift, they are goal focused.

Ordinary conversations drift, touching on a mix of topics casually. This relaxed style is great for a general exchange of thoughts but doesn't work when you need to get specific facts.

Investigative conversations stay on point, focusing on gathering exact information. They're organised in a way that each question leads to a clear fact, avoiding the usual wanderings of a normal chat.

2. Answers to questions vs Responses to questions

Investigators notice when people merely respond to their questions without answering them.

When asked a question, giving an answer means people offer clear information that satisfies the requirements of the question.

But sometimes, people respond without actually answering.

When digging for facts, it's important to NOTICE when someone is giving you the real answer or just talking around it. If you notice your question has not been answered, ask it again!

3. Lying vs Evasion

There's a fine line between lying and evasion.

Lying is dishonestly making a statement that does not correspond to the facts.

Evasion is telling a distorted narrative: it has elements of truth but it leaves out certain facts or distorts the time-line.

Evasion is more common than lying.

Evading the truth is when they're not direct, but they don't lie outright.

Both can be tricky in investigative talks. If someone isn't telling the truth, you can show them evidence that says otherwise.

But if they evade the truth, you might need to ask more pointed questions.

Summary

Recognising these distinctions is important for effective investigations.

• We must talk with a clear purpose.
• We must discover answers.
• We must stop evasions.

About the Author: Chris Farmer

Chris Farmer is the founder of the Corporate Coach Group and has many years’ experience in training leaders and managers, in both the public and private sectors, to achieve their organisational goals, especially during tough economic times. He is also well aware of the disciplines and problems associated with running a business.

Over the years, Chris has designed and delivered thousands of training programmes and has coached and motivated many management teams, groups and individuals. His training programmes are both structured and clear, designed to help delegates organise their thinking and, wherever necessary, to improve their techniques and skills.

Blogs by Email

Do you want to receive an email whenever we post a new blog? The blogs contain article 5-10 minutes long - ideal for reading during your coffee break!

Further Reading in Communication - Clear Communication

• Communication Skills: Two Opposites
  Ambiguity and vagueness in language causes breakdown in communication and leads to misunderstanding and conflicts.
  Read Article >
• Communication Skills: Clear Thinking
  One of the best ways to improve the clarity of your thinking is to get into the habit of differentiating between pairs of similar but opposing concepts.
  Read Article >
• Communication Skills: ABC Principle
  Making sure that people understand your message is important, and there are three ways you can make this happen: By being accurate, being brief and being clear. We call this the ABC principle.
  Read Article >
• Clear Communication
  Clear Communication How would you rate yourself as a clear communicator? Do people always understand your message? Or when you speak, do you suffer the problem of other people NOT properly understanding your exact meaning? You need to develop the skill of clear communication It is important that you do, because...
  Read Article >
• Six Essential Business Communication Skills
  In order to do business you need to be able to communicate with potential clients. In this blog we examine the six essential communication skills you need in business. How many do you possess?
  Read Article >

Looking for Communication Skills Training?

If you're looking to develop your Clear Communication Skills, you may find this Communication Skills Training Course beneficial:

Open Training Course Pricing and Availability

Next Open Course Starts in 4 days, London - Central, places available Book Now >